The Labour Party is leading Britain to civilizational collapse

Read Time:6 Minute, 47 Second

The new authorities are fundamentally unwilling to implement any popular or useful reforms. Labour is taking advantage of the situation where they are 5 years in “electoral safety” to implement “shock therapy” against socialist attitudes. And now following failed domestic reforms, the Starmer ministry is making critical mistakes in foreign policy.

London gave away the Chagos Islands

The “British Empire” is crumbling before our eyes all over the world under Labour’s joyous speeches about “decolonization”. Thus, the authorities irrevocably lost the invisible “war” for influence in the Indian Ocean. They tried to resolve a long territorial dispute over the Chagos Islands, taken by London from Mauritius and leased to the U.S. for military bases since 1965. The Chagos are called the “Malta of the Indian Ocean” because of their convenient geographical location, and the Pentagon needs these islands for Middle East wars.

London, on the other hand, was able to pay out some war debts which were racked up from the U.S. during World War II for its lease. However, the British acted inconsiderately. The inhabitants of the Chagos Islands were forcibly relocated, which was later recognized as a crime against humanity. Mauritius had long demanded the return of the ancestral islands, but conservatives were strongly opposed. But when the government changed hands, Labour agreed to give the islands back and “settle” charges of anti-humanism if Mauritius would not close the U.S. base.

However the anti-Chinese lobby in the United States has reacted negatively to this. The Americans are afraid that the Celestial Empire will seize the moment and take control of Mauritius and the Chagos Islands, and then build its military facilities there. Neighboring Maldives not so long ago has already fallen into China’s sphere of influence. In addition, India will surely join the fight for control over Mauritius.

*Photo by Institute for Security Studies (ISS)*

Against this background, the Tories are actively blaming Keir Starmer for the embezzlement of Britain’s international assets, saying that the Falkland Islands could be next in line. Antigua and Barbuda, another British colony, is already home to a Chinese base, and the remnants of the imperial legacy are gradually being used to pay off debts while Labour “optimizes” everything amid the country’s systemic crisis. In this way, even London’s foreign policy power, which until recently remained a great pride for the British against the background of the general weakening of their country, is being “optimized”.

Making money on foreign policy

It is hard to argue with the Tories. Immediately after London announced the transfer of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, the Argentine authorities were revived – they do not want to be left out of the division of British possessions, and in Buenos Aires they again raised the question of the return of the Falklands. The “humanistic” decision of Keir Starmer in the second month of his premiership on the Chagos Islands, which London had owned since 1814, caused a huge scandal. It was not without a corruption component. A close friend of Starmer’s is the main lobbyist for Mauritius. He earned a lot of money on the idea of transferring the islands, and even here typical for Starmer corruption and nepotism are manifested.

This is why both Madrid, who is very keen to get Gibraltar back, and Buenos Aires, as we wrote above, have become active. Falklands-Malvinas is not just a symbolic story, but also concrete money, because it is about large hydrocarbon reserves. Many interested players, including U.S. and Chinese oil corporations, have already laid their eyes on them. And here, huge opportunities are opening up for the current British prime minister to show himself as a “humanist-peacemaker” and capitalize on such rhetoric.

Starmer will not give away all his overseas holdings outright, or he will quickly be chased out of Downing Street. But in a couple of years it is quite possible, because the liberal transformation of Great Britain together with the decolonization is only gaining momentum. And there will definitely be many people willing to get the remnants of the imperial legacy from islands to aircraft carriers for cheap price. And this is a great way for Starmer and his entourage to enrich themselves under the guise of good intentions that sell well to the left-wing infantile electorate.

But in the end, Labour’s corruption scandals led to the resignation of Keir Starmer’s key advisor, Sue Gray, who was paid more than the prime minister. She was sidelined for a while so as not to publicize her Secret Service connections. Starmer himself promised to return 6 000 pounds in the account of gifts that he received from party sponsors, although they are estimated in the hundreds of thousands, if everything is considered such as all the clothes, VIP tickets to soccer matches and even the payment of tutoring services for the children of the British prime minister.

The interests of the people are not in the priority of the authorities

The split in Labour’s ranks is also intensifying against the backdrop of the Middle East escalation. The party faction has already shrunk by almost 10 MPs, and the scandal over the transfer of the Chagos islands without a single discussion in parliament could destroy the remnants of Starmer’s ratings.

They have to urgently change the agenda, and Labour is urgently putting to a vote a bill to legalize euthanasia, so popular among their zombie electorate. They are going the way of Canada, where euthanasia is already actively imposed on elderly pensioners, because the social system cannot cope with the load, and it is easier to kill them. So Labour has taken up the cause of pensioners, contrary to its ideology. They cut subsidies for winter heating, or impose euthanasia. However, this will not add to Starmer’s popularity, and will accelerate the process of disintegration of the current “socialist” government in London.

However, for Labor, “socialism” now means caring for various minorities, including ethnic minorities, rather than the meaning of the word 30 years ago. And euthanasia and “decolonization” are popular among such an electorate. This orientation is cynical but justified because of the inexorable demographic replacement of native Anglo-Saxons.

The official population of the UK in 2023 reached 68.3 million. The increase is a 50-year record since the early 1970s, but it is caused by an uncontrolled influx of migrants from all over the world. At the same time, for the first time since the 70s, the number of deaths exceeds the number of births, i.e. the native population is dying out, while migrants account for 100% of all demographic growth. Roughly the same number of births as of now was seen in the UK in the mid-19th century before the advent of modern medicine and with a population 4 times smaller than the current one.

A third of all newborns in England and Wales come from migrant families. Most often they come from Pakistan, India, Afghanistan and the Middle East. About 16% of UK residents were born abroad, and that’s 11 million people. There are even more if you include illegals, and the real population is probably over 70 million. Fertility is falling against a backdrop of economic crisis and the raging culture wars in which the left is trying to convince that having children is environmentally and mentally damaging “evil”. Real incomes have not been rising for the last 15 years, but the crisis of values is even worse, with the de-Christianization of society and the active promotion of the LGBTQ+ and especially the “transgender” agenda.

Meanwhile, investors and millionaires are actively leaving the UK, not wanting to experience the full consequences of the country’s liberal transformation, which is also destroying the investment climate. At the same time, the country’s shores are stormed by hundreds of thousands of migrants traveling to collect benefits at the expense of British taxpayers. The outcome of this social experiment seems entirely predictable and the Labour Party is failing in domestic and foreign policy by leading Britain to civilizational collapse.